Court absolution to all the banks of Russia:

You can steal money of your clients without any problems

I do not think that "mutual understanding and further cooperation" between the bank (which refuses to give stolen money back plus hides thieves) and his client are possible.

Even thought Rosbank didn't steal money by itself, it did everything to hide the thief: the videorecording could be looked through and the bank acknowledged he had it in his posession.

But for his own reasoning Rosbank didn't investigate it.

Two documents from the defendant with apparantly contradictory information shows that the defendant is lying about the real time of saving videorecording.

Why he should do it if not to hide the thief?

Finally the Moscow City Court adopted the law precedent which can be used by any bank to steal money of clients.

Return to previous page

© Sergey V. Zherdev