Here you will find unusual documents - documents from court officials as permission to break law. Most of judges would be surprised to realize that their rights are much more wider than they've imagined before. |
|---|
| 1. This official document is official declaration: "Judges of the Moscow City Court can break the law because of existing conditions - lack of time" | ||
|---|---|---|
This letter came to me as a reply to my complaint about breach of law in Moscow City Court. It's written there that because of "existing conditions" judges have limited time to hold hearings; if you are not agree with it - you are free to appeal. Speaking with other words: We do not deny that judges in our court break the law, but we think that because of "existing conditions" it's OK. If you are not agree - try to appeal. Attention: the mentioned court is second and third apellate jurisdiction court at the same time. Thus the author of the letter offers to appeal a court holding to... themselves. |
Earlier noone in Russia could be surprised if he was summoned before a judge and having come saw someone at judge's place been not familiar to a judge at all - wearing no gown. But a lot of things has changed in court these years. And today it's a surprise to see a judge at his workplace without a gown. According to a part of 2 articles 21 of the Law of the Russian Federation from June, 26th, 1992 ¹ 3132-1 «About the status of judges in the Russian Federation» making justice all the judges should dress cloaks. In reply to my letter the Moscow City Court informs that "in summertime in separate days taking into account a high temperature mode the possibility of carrying uniform regimentals (white blouses (shirt) with a short sleeve, dark skirts (trousers) is not excluded" - it's a clear break of law. |
|
 |
 |
| 3. One more absolution: The timå to make remarks to court records was reduced from 2 days to several hours | ||
|---|---|---|
This case is special. The Civil proceeding code gives parties 2 days to make remarks to court records. I came to the court in first of those days and asked for the records. They refused to give it to me. I sent a claim to the court chairman. In his first reply letter he paid no attantion to the informaion of the judge's law violation. I had to file a suit against him. After that, in his second letter he wrote that one special instruction on judicial office-work in district court (adopted by the order of Judicial department by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation from April, 29th, 2003 N 36) permits judges not to give court records untill the final day (when it's possible to make remarks) has came. Thus the 2 days period was reduced to several hours: rights of parties in court granted by law were violated by underlaw instruction. |
Most of people used to get salary (at least part of it) on the banking card. Most of people (at least part of it) are not happy when the earned money suddenly dissapear from that card. And still less people are happy when bank makes everything to hide the thieves so it becomes hard to believe that the bank didn't get involved in it. It happened so that Mr. A. used his banking card only for taking salary from it. He did it only in one place - automatic cash terminal of that bank placed in the office of that bank. One day when he was trying to withdraw money from his card he found out that 100000 rubles he left earlier in it - dissapeared. For more information press the link or picture below. |
|
 |
 |